Managing the Ocean as a Shared Resource: The Transition from the Tragedy of the Commons to Community-Based Governance in the Bengkulu Coast
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/fjsr.v5i6.41Keywords:
Metabolic Rift, Tragedy of the Commons, Ostrom, RTRW, RZWP3KAbstract
This study examines marine management as a shared resource in Enggano Island, Seluma Market, and Linau and Merpas Villages, Bengkulu, which face pressure on the use of coastal space and conflicts of interest. The purpose of the study is to analyze the dynamics of ocean governance through the integration of the concept of tragedy of the commons, the principles of institutional design of the commons, and the perspective of metabolic rift. The research uses a qualitative approach of case studies with field observation techniques, in-depth interviews with key informants, and analysis of policy documents. The results of the study show that the problem of marine management does not only stem from institutional weaknesses, but also from the orientation of spatial planning policies that tend to favor capital accumulation and marginalize indigenous communities and small fishers.
References
Adhuri, D. S., et al. (2023). [Detail bibliografi perlu diverifikasi dari sumber asli].
Angus, I. (2016). Facing the Anthropocene: Fossil capitalism and the crisis of the Earth system. Monthly Review Press.
Angus, I. (2017). A redder shade of green: Intersections of science and socialism. Monthly Review Press.
Angus, I. (2023). The war against the commons: Dispossession and resistance in the making of capitalism. Monthly Review Press.
Armitage, D., et al. (2022). [Detail bibliografi perlu diverifikasi dari sumber asli].
Barbesgaard, M. (2018). Blue growth: Savior or ocean grabbing? The Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(1), 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1377186.
Bennett, N. J., Blythe, J., White, C. S., & Campero, C. (2021). Blue growth and blue justice: Ten risks and solutions for the ocean economy. Marine Policy, 125, Article 104387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104387.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.
Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2021). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. SAGE. [Cek ulang edisi dan tahun terbit].
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652-661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206.
Cockburn, J., et al. (2022). [Detail bibliografi perlu diverifikasi dari sumber asli].
Cox, M., Arnold, G., & Villamayor Tomás, S. (2010). A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society, 15(4), Article 38. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03704-150438.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
de la Rosa, E., Boer, M., Taryono, & Adi, H. (2021). Effectiveness of customary fisheries management on maintaining reef health status in Mayalibit Bay, Raja Ampat. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Kelautan Tropis, 13(2), 345-360. https://doi.org/10.29244/jitkt.v13i2.35824.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Ferse, S. C. A., et al. (2024). [Detail bibliografi perlu diverifikasi dari sumber asli].
Firdaus, M., & Bush, S. R. (2024). [Detail bibliografi perlu diverifikasi dari sumber asli].
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2023). [Detail bibliografi perlu diverifikasi dari sumber asli].
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2024). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2024: Blue transformation in action. FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cd0683en.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Duke University, & WorldFish. (2023). Illuminating hidden harvests: The contributions of small-scale fisheries to sustainable development. FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc4576en.
Foster, J. B., & Clark, B. (2022). Socialism and ecological survival. Monthly Review, 74(3), 1-33.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.
Hardin, G. (1998). Extensions of “The tragedy of the commons.” Science, 280(5364), 682-683. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5364.682.
Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford University Press.
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, Article 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523.
House, J., Kleiber, D., Steenbergen, D. J., & Stacey, N. (2023). Participatory monitoring in community-based fisheries management through a gender lens. Ambio, 52, 300-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01783-3.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (H. Lee & J. Romero, Eds.). IPCC. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.
Jentoft, S., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2022). Interactive learning and governance transformation for securing blue justice for small-scale fisheries. Administration & Society, 54(7), 1255-1282. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211073947.
Kashwan, P., et al. (2023). [Detail bibliografi perlu diverifikasi dari sumber asli].
Lam, V. W. Y., Allison, E. H., Bell, J. D., Blythe, J., Cheung, W. W. L., Frölicher, T. L., Gasalla, M. A., & Sumaila, U. R. (2020). Climate change, tropical fisheries and prospects for sustainable development. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1, 440-454. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0071-9.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell.
Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2021). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE.
Martins, I. M., & Gasalla, M. A. (2020). Adaptive capacity level shapes social vulnerability to climate change of fishing communities in the South Brazil Bight. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7, Article 481. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00481.
McGinnis, M. D., & Ostrom, E. (2014). Social-ecological system framework: Initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecology and Society, 19(2), Article 30. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06387-190230.
Moore, J. W. (2017). Metabolic rift or metabolic shift? Dialectics, nature, and the world-historical method. Theory and Society, 46, 285-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-017-9290-6.
Muawanah, U., De Alessi, M., Pomeroy, R., Kurniasari, N., Shafitri, N., & Yulianty, C. (2021). Going into hak: Pathways for revitalizing marine tenure rights in Indonesia. Ocean & Coastal Management, 215, Article 105944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105944.
Nurhidayah, L., et al. (2023). [Detail bibliografi perlu diverifikasi dari sumber asli].
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Owusu, K. A., Kulesz, M. M., & Merico, A. (2021). Communication among harvesters leads to sustainable fishing behaviour in a continuous time common pool resource experiment. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, Article 644056. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.644056.
Partelow, S. (2024). [Detail bibliografi perlu diverifikasi dari sumber asli].
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE.
Robbins, P. (2020). Political ecology: A critical introduction (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Saito, K. (2020). Marx’s theory of metabolism in the age of global ecological crisis. Historical Materialism, 28(2), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-20202802.
Satria, A., et al. (2022). [Detail bibliografi perlu diverifikasi dari sumber asli].
Schlosberg, D. (2021). [Detail bibliografi perlu diverifikasi dari sumber asli].
Singh, P., Linnér, B. O., & Singh, A. A. (2025). Marine spatial planning and ocean governance in Small Island Developing States. Regional Environmental Change, 25, Article 91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-025-02412-x.
Stalmokaitė, I., & Tafon, R. (2025). Exploring social justice in marine spatial planning: Planner and stakeholder perspectives and experiences in the Baltic Sea Region. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 68(5), 1105-1127.
Steenbergen, D. J., Raubani, J., Gereva, S., Naviti, W., Arthur, C., Arudere, A., Ham, J., Joy, L., Lalavanua, W., Neihapi, P., Seko, A., Terashima, H., & Andrew, N. L. (2022). Tracing innovation pathways behind fisheries co-management in Vanuatu. Ambio, 51, 2359-2375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01788-y.
Temper, L., Rodríguez, I., & Walter, M. (2023). Takeaways for environmental justice movements. In I. Rodríguez, M. Walter, & L. Temper (Eds.), Just transformations: Grassroots struggles for alternative futures (pp. 333-340). Pluto Press.
United Nations Environment Programme. (2023). Decades of mangrove forest change: What does it mean for nature, people and the climate? United Nations Environment Programme.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.
